FORUM HOME > TNM > Discussion
How many circuits?

JeepGuyPosted on 01/16/08 at 17:42:12

How many here on the boards are currently running circuits and not posting them here?

What are you running and why aren't you posting?
ThnikkamanPosted on 01/16/08 at 17:57:43

I am running two circuits. I have been running a WWE circuit that I started with WM 22. I am also running a TNA circuit that I started in November. Before that, I was running a NWA and a ECW circuit (my WWE has no third brand, although I did experiment with an OVW developmental brand last year). I decided that I didn't have time and desire to run 3 circuits, so I combined NWA and ECW into TNA. Rough start that was, but its been getting better lately.

Basically I don't post here because it would take so much to post my WWE circuit (I will be starting my 3rd year of WWE with WM 24). Also, if someone leaves one of my other circuits, I tend to bring them into the other one, so I would have to post both circuits, and at this stage in life (job searching, married, kids) I just don't have the time to post. But I do make references to my current work, and am interested in sharing with the rest of the TNM community when I get the chance
Hello MamushiPosted on 01/16/08 at 18:37:29

I just started a new circuit a couple days ago just as something to help tide me over if I have the urge to TNM, but not enough motivation to do GLWF.

And I'm not posting it because I'm half assing it.  It's really barebones.  I'd rather not diminish any sort of reputation for quality I might've garnered through GLWF. :)
SnDvls316Posted on 01/16/08 at 19:58:17

I have 4 congruent circuts I'm running Seven Years in (52 cards a year) for each.

I've asked to get a forum to post them in as it will be much easier on the eyes and to follow along there, but we'll see.

I don't do any storylines though it's just matches...it started out strictly Face/Heel, but has now evolved to be every man for himself.
JeepGuyPosted on 01/16/08 at 20:08:19

On 01/16/08 at 19:58:17, SnDvls316 wrote:
I don't do any storylines though it's just matches...it started out strictly Face/Heel, but has now evolved to be every man for himself.
If you don't do storylines, what do you get out of it?

Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to pick a fight or tell anyone how they do it "is wrong", I'm just interested in what everyone else does (plus I am bored as hell at work ;D)

Years ago, I ran a little circuit with some of my friends as the wrestlers and wrote up short little cards. I used to laugh while writing them because I tried hard to get all the little things down that my friends did. No need to post it anywhere because I doubted anyone would get it all anyway though the cards were (in my opinion) entertaining short reads.

I am currently putting together another circuit (circa 1985) which has been a blast just doing the research to make everything "just right".
VertigoPosted on 01/16/08 at 23:50:22

Using TNM-RG rules with a circuit starting in 1980. It was put on hiatus about a third of the way through 1981. Hope to return to it someday...

Right now running an indy promotion using a Ruleset I've created (and continued to add to) as I run the circuit. I will eventually post this circuit and hopefully the ruleset.
The TNM Members ChampPosted on 01/16/08 at 23:59:53

Vertigo, you should post the results you have for your 1980 TNM-RG circuit. I would be interested in reading it.
ScottPosted on 01/17/08 at 18:24:32

Right now I'm only running a practice circuit with my fantasy wrestlers. I'm testing them out so I can tweak them until they are completed. Then I will start up my olf BXW circuit again, or one like it. It was a circuit I ran in the late 90's called Beyond XTreme Wrestling, but I may cut down on the death matches and make it more like an old school ECW circuit, with some elements of BJPW, FMW, and IWA Japan. Maybe even some WWE, WCW, and ROH elements as well.
Masked_TexanPosted on 01/17/08 at 20:08:24

Well, being the deranged lunatic that I am, I'm running about 30 right now.  ;D

I haven't posted anything new on my old website, but I will within the next month or so, when I fill all of my vacant titles.

My timeframe is from 1978 - 1992.  I've just started on the month of January 1978, so it's still in the infant stage.  I use a mixture of wrestlers from that timeframe, so, some guys may look out of place from one year to the next, it's just easier to do it this way.

Even though I'm running in the territorial times, I'm not about to run each circuit everyday (Wish I could, but we don't have the "saved linups" feature in TNM  ;)  ;D ) so, I just run cards when there is a title match, or when the World Champ comes into the area.
The TNM Members ChampPosted on 01/17/08 at 21:28:17

Oliver really needs to implement the saved lineup feature as soon as possible. That along with editing saved cards and allowing for the ability to book cards weeks in advance if necessary.

It would be nice to get a State of TNM e-mail once in awhile. I miss those.
SnDvls316Posted on 01/18/08 at 00:49:44

On 01/16/08 at 20:08:19, JeepGuy wrote:
If you don't do storylines, what do you get out of it?

Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to pick a fight or tell anyone how they do it "is wrong", I'm just interested in what everyone else does (plus I am bored as hell at work ;D)

 
the enjoyment of seeing if The Acolytes can win the Tag Titles for a 16th time or seeing Tajiri go on a 36 card undefeated streak with the TV title.

It's all unbooked so I go with what the game gives me, I roll dice to see if wrestlers get hired and it's based on the current # there is in the fed, have matches that "eliminate" from the lowest wrestlers in the fed.

I guess it's the same thing people get out of playing Zelda for the nintendo... the use of my imigination and what "would be" going on in the fed at the time.

I just don't have the time to do full bookings and long drawn out feuds ect. I've tried TEW many times and not only is it a total click fest, but just way too much to do just to get a match....I just want to see the match I could care less how many t-shirst the dude sells  ;D

It honestly looks a lot like Oliver's WWF circut (the begining) where there is only matches (no need to add commentary to my matches if it's only for my enjoyment)

anyhow no offense taken at all on it...to each their own.
ScottPosted on 01/18/08 at 01:29:52

On 01/16/08 at 20:08:19, JeepGuy wrote:
If you don't do storylines, what do you get out of it?

Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to pick a fight or tell anyone how they do it "is wrong", I'm just interested in what everyone else does (plus I am bored as hell at work ;D)

Years ago, I ran a little circuit with some of my friends as the wrestlers and wrote up short little cards. I used to laugh while writing them because I tried hard to get all the little things down that my friends did. No need to post it anywhere because I doubted anyone would get it all anyway though the cards were (in my opinion) entertaining short reads.

I am currently putting together another circuit (circa 1985) which has been a blast just doing the research to make everything "just right".
It all depends on what kind of circuit I'm running. If I'm running an American, or even a Lucha circuit, then yes, I do use storylines (unless it's ROH, because ROH is primarily not based on storylines, although they do have them), However, if I run a Puroresu circuit, then no. What's the sense of running storylines in a puro circuit, when the majority of the wrestlers can't speak English?
ThnikkamanPosted on 01/18/08 at 01:49:11

On 01/18/08 at 00:49:44, SnDvls316 wrote:

the enjoyment of seeing if The Acolytes can win the Tag Titles for a 16th time or seeing Tajiri go on a 36 card undefeated streak with the TV title.

It's all unbooked so I go with what the game gives me, I roll dice to see if wrestlers get hired and it's based on the current # there is in the fed, have matches that "eliminate" from the lowest wrestlers in the fed.

I guess it's the same thing people get out of playing Zelda for the nintendo... the use of my imigination and what "would be" going on in the fed at the time.

I just don't have the time to do full bookings and long drawn out feuds ect. I've tried TEW many times and not only is it a total click fest, but just way too much to do just to get a match....I just want to see the match I could care less how many t-shirst the dude sells  ;D

It honestly looks a lot like Oliver's WWF circut (the begining) where there is only matches (no need to add commentary to my matches if it's only for my enjoyment)

anyhow no offense taken at all on it...to each their own.
with the exception of the reference to Oliver's circuit (of which I am unfamiliar), I guess this would also accuratley describe my circuits. I do however add storylines and backstage segments in between matches using the match comments option, but again, that's just for me
HHHWrestlingLegendPosted on 01/19/08 at 02:20:38

I have a TNA and WWE Fed right now and I can say that I have tried both ways.  I use Interview Integrater for Backstage Interviews, Run-In's, and Ringside Commentary and usually I end up in a position where I am spending over an hourand a half just running one card and by the time I am done, I am already burned out on sitting in front of the game.

On the other hand, when I would just book small interview highlights and 98% matches only, I could run through a month or two in one setting.  And like was mentioned before, only I see my circuts, so as to wether or not I waiste time by typing interviews and commentary, who knows?  Sometimes it's fun.  Sometimes it burns me out much more quickly.  It just depends on what mood I am in.

Honestly, I can sit and use my imagination and see all the events playing out in my head as I schedule the matches.  But more than likely, in four months if I go back to look at a circut as it would stand today, having written interviews and commentary helps to refresh my memory as to what is going on.

I guess what it boils down to is it's not for everybody.  My biggest problem is if I sit down to write a brief ringside interview, it normally ends up being about 10,000 words and goes on forever.

Tim
ThnikkamanPosted on 01/19/08 at 02:38:02

probably the one thing I don't do that everyone else does is I run my circuits in "real time." That means, tonight I will run WWE Smackdown, Monday I will run Raw, Thursday I will run TNA Impact, and I only run PPV's on the day they are scheduled. I do this for because it really appeals to me, and this way I only spend about 3 to 5 hours a week playing TNM. More time to spend at work, and with the family, and I still get my three shows a week and two PPV's a month.

Anyone else run "real time" or does pretty much everyone run multiple cards at one sitting?
ScottPosted on 01/19/08 at 03:05:36

On 01/19/08 at 02:38:02, Thnikkaman wrote:probably the one thing I don't do that everyone else does is I run my circuits in "real time." That means, tonight I will run WWE Smackdown, Monday I will run Raw, Thursday I will run TNA Impact, and I only run PPV's on the day they are scheduled. I do this for because it really appeals to me, and this way I only spend about 3 to 5 hours a week playing TNM. More time to spend at work, and with the family, and I still get my three shows a week and two PPV's a month.

Anyone else run "real time" or does pretty much everyone run multiple cards at one sitting?
I usually multi-task (I do write up multiple cards, but I usually book a couple of matches, then minimize TNM, and do something else for a while until I'm ready to finish the card. I usually plan my cards out a couple days ahead. I do sometimes change the plans, but not very often. When I'm running a bonafide serious circuit, then I usually run a maximum of three to four cards a week. If I'm just fooling around with a practice circuit I does not matter, because I usually only put a couple of matches on a card then, and I usually run practice matches in e-mail mode. I usually do this when I'm tweaking my own wrestlers, or to see if a matchup would look good in a more serious circuit I'm running. I also use it to help hone my angle writing skills. Right now, I'm in the process of creating some fictional wrestling characters although some are loosely based on real wrestlers like my wrestler Richard Oliver Brentwood (or R.O.B. for short) is kind of a cross between JBL and Irwin R. Schyster.
The PhantomPosted on 01/19/08 at 16:14:39

I have 2 with only 1 of them being posted here. It's been while since I ran the other one though. It is a mix of real and fantasy wrestlers. The fantasy wrestlers are ones I've made in e-feds and others that I was able to get from those feds I was in. The roster is huge (137 wrestlers) with both men, women, custom jobbers, and titles galore. Nearly every card has everyone in it so there are lots of rumbles, 4 corner matches, and tournaments. The cards ran in reverse order with all titles being defended first and then the other matches taking place. I didn't have storylines but I did have feuds with most of them being with the fantasy wrestlers. If anyone wants to see how this chaos works, then I can post a card.

The other one of course is my Japanese Pro Wrestling which I run while I'm at work on Saturdays since it is mostly dead while I'm there. I don't plan too much but I limit myself to 8 matches a card and work with what I know of puro from watching videos.
YunPosted on 01/19/08 at 17:01:04

I rarely have more than one circuit running, unless the second has a gimmick of some sort (fantasy wrestlers, special schedule, etc.) The main reason I don't post my circuits is because they rarely last more than five cards these days before I get bored with the storylines and delete the circuit.
VertigoPosted on 01/19/08 at 17:06:05

The only time I've run multiple cards in one sitting was when I was using the TNM-RG rules.

This is a cheap plug, but King_Of_Old_School is running a WWF 1993 circuit right now and his write-ups are TREMENDOUS! They aren't long, the interviews aren't word-for-word, and it's just really well written. I think if anyone hasn't read it yet, give it a shot. I've learned a lot about efficient write ups from his circuit and I think everyone here could too.
ThnikkamanPosted on 01/19/08 at 18:47:52

On 01/19/08 at 17:06:05, Vertigo wrote:The only time I've run multiple cards in one sitting was when I was using the TNM-RG rules.

This is a cheap plug, but King_Of_Old_School is running a WWF 1993 circuit right now and his write-ups are TREMENDOUS! They aren't long, the interviews aren't word-for-word, and it's just really well written. I think if anyone hasn't read it yet, give it a shot. I've learned a lot about efficient write ups from his circuit and I think everyone here could too.
I would like to echo this. King's '93 circuit is gold. Do yourself a favor and check it out!
King_Of_Old_SchoolPosted on 01/20/08 at 23:34:05

Cheers guys. I appreciate you taking the time to read and comment on my circuit.
kinglawlerPosted on 01/25/08 at 07:26:05

I am currently running four circuts: Raw, Smackdown, ECW, and TNA. I have wrestlers from those four circuts and ROH to choose from. I am using the TNM rule set, and the circuts get to pick from free agents based on who had the highest rating from the week before. I am on week 40 now.
Not that anybody gives a shit, but here are my champions:
Raw:  World/El Generico  US/Rey Misterio Tag/The World's Greatest Tag Team
Smackdown:  WCW/Shane McMahon  IC/Batista  Tag/Kane and Undertaker
ECW:  ECW/Big Daddy V  Hardcore/Rasheed Lucuis Creed  Tag/Eric Stevens and Kevin Steen
TNA:  World/Paul London  X-Divsion/Bryan Danielson  Tag/Jerry Lynn and Petey Williams
Memphis VicePosted on 01/26/08 at 20:14:52

On 01/25/08 at 07:26:05, kinglawler wrote:
Not that anybody gives a shit, but here are my champions:
Sounds like a fun and interesting circuit/set of circuits.

I burned out on my TNM-RG Memphis circuit at Week 250, so I started an AWA circuit with a stricter interpetation of the RG rules. I'm having a blast with it at Week 59.

World champ: Randy Savage (w/ Sensational Sherri) feuding with Ultimo Dragon, while former champ Bobo Brazil is still a thorn in Savage's side.

Tag champs: Cactus Jack/Kevin Sullivan (about to enter a series vs. #1 contenders, Los Sexy Boys (Hector Garza/Latin Lover).

TV champ: Tommy Gilbert, who has put on some amazing matches, is my go-to guy for "getting the new guy over",  and has gone toe-to-toe in feuds with now-departed stars Curt Hennig and Kurt Angle.

Further down the card, David Taylor and Dynamite Kid have a British face tag team, and Jerry Lawler & Mike Enos are angry at each other over their failure to hold onto the tag belts for long.
The TNM Members ChampPosted on 01/26/08 at 20:36:21

On 01/26/08 at 20:14:52, Memphis Vice wrote:

Sounds like a fun and interesting circuit/set of circuits.

I burned out on my TNM-RG Memphis circuit at Week 250, so I started an AWA circuit with a stricter interpetation of the RG rules. I'm having a blast with it at Week 59.

World champ: Randy Savage (w/ Sensational Sherri) feuding with Ultimo Dragon, while former champ Bobo Brazil is still a thorn in Savage's side.

Tag champs: Cactus Jack/Kevin Sullivan (about to enter a series vs. #1 contenders, Los Sexy Boys (Hector Garza/Latin Lover).

TV champ: Tommy Gilbert, who has put on some amazing matches, is my go-to guy for "getting the new guy over",  and has gone toe-to-toe in feuds with now-departed stars Curt Hennig and Kurt Angle.

Further down the card, David Taylor and Dynamite Kid have a British face tag team, and Jerry Lawler & Mike Enos are angry at each other over their failure to hold onto the tag belts for long.
You should start posting these results or post them to a website like the USWA.
rey619Posted on 01/26/08 at 23:49:39

I usually go really in-depth in my circuits, using Socko's Financial Rulesheet and all to simulate the financial well-being of my circuit. It takes some time, but makes my TNM-experience a hybrid between TEW and TNM. As you can see from my MWA-circuit, I write a lot on my circuits (maybe too much).

I guess I write that much for my own enjoyment too. Nowadays, all the creative writing I do is for TNM, so.. there you go. Lets me practice my English as well (it's not my native language).

I have ran WWE in real-time as well, but that was when I was a student with way too much time on my hand. Now, with work, social life and wrestling training, I prefer to run indy-shows. That way, I can have an erratic schedule :)
JeepGuyPosted on 01/28/08 at 19:22:33

On 01/26/08 at 23:49:39, rey619 wrote:Lets me practice my English as well (it's not my native language).

I have ran WWE in real-time as well, but that was when I was a student with way too much time on my hand. Now, with work, social life and wrestling training, I prefer to run indy-shows. That way, I can have an erratic schedule :)
What's your native language and what part of the world are you from?

Who are you training with
The TNM Members ChampPosted on 01/29/08 at 02:43:27

On 01/19/08 at 17:06:05, Vertigo wrote:The only time I've run multiple cards in one sitting was when I was using the TNM-RG rules.

This is a cheap plug, but King_Of_Old_School is running a WWF 1993 circuit right now and his write-ups are TREMENDOUS! They aren't long, the interviews aren't word-for-word, and it's just really well written. I think if anyone hasn't read it yet, give it a shot. I've learned a lot about efficient write ups from his circuit and I think everyone here could too.
Just wondering, but what do you have against written out interviews? I can see the benefit of summarized interviews but you don't have the ability of putting a character over as effectively as you can with a written out interview.
JeepGuyPosted on 01/29/08 at 03:44:33

On 01/29/08 at 02:43:27, The TNM Members Champ wrote:Just wondering, but what do you have against written out interviews? I can see the benefit of summarized interviews but you don't have the ability of putting a character over as effectively as you can with a written out interview.
I know this question wasn't directed at me but I thought I'd give an answer as to why I don't - it takes some time for one (I know, I used to do them) and I would go over and over them to get them just right. After doing that for a couple of cards, it starts to seem more like a chore than fun.

The other thing, too, is that the longer the cards are, I think you'll get less readership and/or comments. While I enjoy doing this stuff, I do like getting feedback (any feedback - good or bad).
pszPosted on 01/29/08 at 04:26:06

I *RARELY* do interviews, as most (all?) of my cards have always been for me and/or used to keep track of wins, losses, and rankings.

However, when/if I do interviews, I use the old WWE method: Bullet points. From there, the "meat" is imagined pretty well, based on the character.

Dunno why, I just always preferred the "bullet points" to an in-depth interview (Though I have used some of the ideas I've posted here before in a circuit... RVD's jump to a new promotion, for example ;->)
mdale2kPosted on 01/29/08 at 04:36:38

On 01/26/08 at 23:49:39, rey619 wrote:I usually go really in-depth in my circuits, using Socko's Financial Rulesheet and all to simulate the financial well-being of my circuit. It takes some time, but makes my TNM-experience a hybrid between TEW and TNM. As you can see from my MWA-circuit, I write a lot on my circuits (maybe too much).

I guess I write that much for my own enjoyment too. Nowadays, all the creative writing I do is for TNM, so.. there you go. Lets me practice my English as well (it's not my native language).

I have ran WWE in real-time as well, but that was when I was a student with way too much time on my hand. Now, with work, social life and wrestling training, I prefer to run indy-shows. That way, I can have an erratic schedule :)
Can anyone point me in the direction of socko's financial rulesheet?  I would be very interested in seeing / using it.
rey619Posted on 01/29/08 at 08:09:10

Drop me a PM with your e-mail adress, and I'll send it to you.
rey619Posted on 01/29/08 at 08:11:25

On 01/28/08 at 19:22:33, JeepGuy wrote:
What's your native language and what part of the world are you from?

Who are you training with
I'm from Norway, and speak Norwegian. I'm currently training with the Norwegian Wrestling Federation. We only train once a week, so even though I've been training for a year, I still haven't been in the ring in front of a crowd.
JeepGuyPosted on 01/29/08 at 08:19:52

On 01/29/08 at 08:11:25, rey619 wrote:
I'm from Norway, and speak Norwegian. I'm currently training with the Norwegian Wrestling Federation. We only train once a week, so even though I've been training for a year, I still haven't been in the ring in front of a crowd.
Your English isn't bad at all. Good luck with the training.
rey619Posted on 01/29/08 at 17:47:43

Thanks. I'm an English major (or, the equivalent of) and work as a translator, so it should be OK. I'm aiming towards an army gimmick when I complete my training. That should be a lot of fun.
JeepGuyPosted on 01/29/08 at 17:57:05

On 01/29/08 at 17:47:43, rey619 wrote:Thanks. I'm an English major (or, the equivalent of) and work as a translator, so it should be OK. I'm aiming towards an army gimmick when I complete my training. That should be a lot of fun.
As an English major and a translator, you should be alright in the English department. Writing on the boards, I would have never known unless you said something, like you did.

Which country's army? Do you have a bicycle corp? I ask because I know someone from Sweden and he served his mandatory two years riding a bicycle. Now, that would be funny - army guy riding in on a bicycle, especially one with a little horn and a card in the spokes, so it makes noise as you ride in to the ring area.
91Posted on 01/29/08 at 23:40:06

On 01/29/08 at 08:11:25, rey619 wrote:

I'm from Norway, and speak Norwegian. I'm currently training with the Norwegian Wrestling Federation. We only train once a week, so even though I've been training for a year, I still haven't been in the ring in front of a crowd.
Question... back in the 80's when Norway pulled off an upset win over England and the Norwegian commentator started reeling off several English historical figures, was that a big a source of humour over there as it was over here?