On 10/12/07 at 21:49:35, Jake wrote:There is a HUGE difference between porn and Bettie Page fetish style shoots that is all I have to say"

On 10/14/07 at 21:21:38, Pedo Bear wrote:She got into an argument with Batista, didn't she?

I mean, that's the most ridicilous reason to fire someone but that is what happened, if I recall.

On 10/14/07 at 21:21:38, Pedo Bear wrote:She got into an argument with Batista, didn't she?

I mean, that's the most ridicilous reason to fire someone but that is what happened, if I recall.

On 10/14/07 at 22:38:24, The TNM Members Champ wrote:

I think that was not the reason, although she didn't get along with him. I read that the reason was that creative didn't like her look. I thought she looked unique but whatever. It was probably a Stephanie McMahon thing.

On 10/15/07 at 04:23:17, AllPowerfulGARTH wrote:Hm, a WWE decision that annoyed the Internet. Must be Triple H's fault.

On 10/16/07 at 02:51:47, Matteus wrote:

Whoa whoa whoa! Don't you go bringing your damned reason and logic into this debate, Garth! Those are tools of the devil himself! The Internets iz always rite!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

On 10/14/07 at 21:44:56, rebelins wrote:Another reason to hate Batista.

On 10/16/07 at 22:34:23, Hockey Lovah wrote:

And why wouldn't the internets be right? They were invented by Al Gore afterall.

On 10/18/07 at 20:26:21, Zedja wrote:
And Al Gore is this years winner of the Nobel Peace Prize.

On 10/18/07 at 20:50:47, The TNM Members Champ wrote:

Your point?

On 10/19/07 at 00:46:25, psz wrote:Kevin Sullivan.

On 10/20/07 at 05:20:17, psz wrote:Cow farts and muscle cars are the cause for global warming!

On 10/20/07 at 05:20:17, psz wrote:No... Kevin Sullivan is The Point(TM)


Cow farts and muscle cars are the cause for global warming!

On 10/20/07 at 18:28:07, Some ARSEHOLE Stole My Gimmick wrote:

Why not Kevin Sullivan's farts?

On 10/20/07 at 21:19:42, JeepGuy wrote:
He'd have to fart an awful lot which wouldn't leave any time for his Satanic lifestyle.

On 10/21/07 at 01:25:30, Memphis Vice wrote:
This made me laugh very hard.

Now back to contemplating Shelly Martinez.

On 10/21/07 at 03:07:14, JeepGuy wrote:
I am wondering how this fetish stuff is going to work. Is she going to be wearing less than what she's already showed in her wrestling days ... or (perish the thought) more?

On 10/19/07 at 02:15:07, Zedja wrote:
Smart people figure that one out for themselves.

On 10/21/07 at 16:26:23, psz wrote:No... 20 years ago they were complaining about the hole in the Ozone layer caused by styrofome and aerosol hairsprays. It was global warming THEN, too ;->

(Granted, 20 years ago was the 80s... *I* was afraid of the hair then, too O_o)

On 10/21/07 at 17:23:25, The TNM Members Champ wrote:No, it was global cooling. Go back to the 70s and read a lot of the same magazines that are pushing the same agenda currently but with a different temperature. How do we go from scientists being absolutely sure we were going into another Ice Age to the scientists now being completely confident that the Earth is going towards Global Warming unless we raise taxes and other socialist positions.

I think some people are easily swayed by scare tactics that Al Gore uses for political gain. They also fail to understand that the Earth goes through cyclical swings in temperature. The Earth has cooled and warmed up many times in the past and it occurred without the scapegoat of blaming capitalism and industry. You're more than welcome to keep believing Al Gore and his mockumentary even with more evidence coming out to refute his findings though.

On 10/21/07 at 17:25:29, Unright wrote:

This is awfully political for a Shelly Martinez thread.

On 10/21/07 at 22:19:05, AllPowerfulGARTH wrote:Damn liberals, always trying to cut down on our fossil fuel consumption and pollution for personal gains that are never adequately explained.

By the way, psz is correct in his assertion that the 80s were 20 years ago, while the 70s -- in which the "global cooling" scare occurred -- were 30 years ago.

On 10/21/07 at 17:33:08, The TNM Members Champ wrote:Then go back and cross off the other posts that instigated it. You can't keep picking and choosing just because you disagree with me. Go back to the first post mentioning Al Gore, for instance. Mentioning a political figure is bound to create a political debate.

On 10/22/07 at 11:56:42, Unright wrote:

Don't take it personally. Your post was just the latest one in the thread when I checked it.

Hockey Lovah, Zedja, psz, and "some ARSEHOLE stole my gimmick" really should take this to the Political Forum.

On 10/22/07 at 18:05:53, JeepGuy wrote:Someone should throw a photo of Shelly up here so we can all finish spurting!

On 10/22/07 at 15:19:46, The TNM Members Champ wrote:

The only reason I did is because I know I'm one of the few conservatives on this board and it does seem like it's not exactly unbiased here. But thanks for the clarification there. :-)

On 10/23/07 at 02:08:33, psz wrote:


Actually, I'm quite conservative, in the very traditional sense.

As I said, I was just correcting the date ;->

On 10/23/07 at 03:40:01, The TNM Members Champ wrote:

I should've said 70s or I could've learned how to add. No worries.

As for the picture of Shelly...Wow. Why would the WWE get rid of her?

On 10/23/07 at 03:48:00, psz wrote:Probably the same old "We had nothing for her" excuse.

Is it just me, though, or did she seem a bit less trim in ECW than that pic?

-- A DVD release titled "The Notorious Jewel De'Nyle & Shelly Martinez" is scheduled to be released in January 2008. It is a "Bettie Page-like" fetish film featuring the former WWE Diva.

On 01/11/08 at 17:16:12, JeepGuy wrote:It is January ... any new news on this? Or at least pics?

On 01/11/08 at 19:15:06, Ekaj wrote:
The only ones I've found so far.