FORUM HOME > Wrestling > US Independents
Why is Jackie Gayda being hyped so much?

AnubisPosted on 11/27/05 at 09:30:11

Okay, a recent poll on a web site asking who the hottest woman in TNA was saw Jackie Gayda win by pretty much a landslide.  On top of that, a lot of sites seem to be making it out to be a big catch or something.

Why?

First off, she has no talent in the ring, and very little talent out of the ring.  Second, she's quite possibly one of the ugliest women in wrestling history, especially with the grotesquely fake breasts that make Trish's look natural.

Why?  Why so much hype?  She's ugly and talentless.  If anything, she'll hurt the product.

I just don't get it.
FormulaFirebird91Posted on 11/27/05 at 10:30:14

I don't think she's that hot. The only good thing we got out of her was to see one of those grotesquely fake boobs when it fell out due to Lance Storm.

However if the majority of the people seem to think she's that good I dunno how it can really hurt the product. Some people think she's really hot. She ain't my cup of tea but I'm not the majority either.

The balance of TNA hardly hangs at the hands of Jackie Gayda. I'd be more concerned with the fact the ratings are falling. Which I'm not too happy about. I want this show to succeed so bad. I love the X-division. The whole show should just be about the X-division. lol But hey thats me.
rey619Posted on 11/27/05 at 21:09:29

I don't think she's ugly at all, although her boob job was obviously over the top. If a majority of fans feels she's the hottest, then she's not going to hurt the product. As I feared, TNA is gearing towards the casuals, and they enjoy big-breasted blondes with no real talent in the ring..
ZedjaPosted on 11/27/05 at 22:24:14

On 11/27/05 at 21:09:29, rey619 wrote:As I feared, TNA is gearing towards the casuals, and they enjoy big-breasted blondes with no real talent in the ring..
Doesn't that go for Hollywood as well?
AnubisPosted on 11/28/05 at 00:34:09

I wouldn't say that applies to Hollywood.  Look at the three most successful and popular women in Hollywood: Julia Roberts, Angelina Jolie, and Cameron Diaz.  Two are brunettes, all three have 100% natural breasts, and two of them are extremely talented.

Cookie to the first one who can guess which one I don't think is quite that talented, LOL.
Snabbit888Posted on 11/28/05 at 01:01:29

God I hope it's Julia Roberts, because she's fucking awful.  In everything.  Why?  Because she's hardly an actor.  She's the same character in every movie.
lambtasticPosted on 11/28/05 at 01:26:57

angelina jolie has DSL!
Murphy42782Posted on 11/28/05 at 05:10:07

On 11/28/05 at 01:01:29, Snabbit888 wrote:God I hope it's Julia Roberts, because she's fucking awful. In everything. Why? Because she's hardly an actor. She's the same character in every movie.
lol, I couldnt agree with Snabbit more. In Ocean's 12 she even pretends to be herself for a little while. Musta been a real stretch for her.
FormulaFirebird91Posted on 11/28/05 at 08:40:35

THANK YOU. I can't STAND Julia Roberts. So nice to know I'm not alone and yeah... she couldn't even handle playing herself in Ocean's 12. That part of the movie just bothered me anyway. It seemed lame.  lol
91Posted on 11/28/05 at 12:07:07

On 11/28/05 at 01:01:29, Snabbit888 wrote:She's the same character in every movie.
Not that I have opinions on any of the actresses listed particularly, but I could have said the same for Cameron Diaz if it wasn't for her Glenn Close style psycho-maniac in Vanilla Sky.
AnubisPosted on 11/29/05 at 02:11:56

Well looks like no one wins.  Cameron Diaz is the one I don't like.

For Julia Roberts, you should trying watching Flatliners, I Love Trouble, and Conspiracy Theory.  Oh, and Erin Brockavich.  The romantic comedies are indeed pretty much all the same, but her thrillers and dramas are great.  I loved Coeans 11 personally, and look forward to Oceans 12, although I'm sure Catherine Zet Jones will overshadow her easily enough.

Angelina Jolie, to me, is the absolute hottest and most talented actress out there right now.

Most overrated in talent and looks goes to Halle Berry (thankfully Pierce Brosnan and Hugh Jackman are able to carry her in James Bond and X-Men).
rey619Posted on 11/29/05 at 08:44:44

And Billy Bob Thornton carried her to an Oscar... much like Triple H carried Batista to stardom (I'm just trying to move back into the realm of wrestling here..)
Rick GarrardPosted on 11/30/05 at 01:43:29

Flair carried Batista to stardom and WWE tag team title gold.  Triple H did nothing.  
Snabbit888Posted on 11/30/05 at 05:18:48

On 11/30/05 at 01:43:29, Rick Garrard wrote:Flair carried Batista to stardom and WWE tag team title gold. Triple H did nothing.
I wholeheartedly disagree. Flair and Batista's tag run was decent, but it didn't exactly skyrocket Batista into anything. Batista's three wins over HHH cemented his status.
Rick GarrardPosted on 11/30/05 at 05:41:28

The tag team laid the foundation for Batista's huge mega-turn on HHH.   Without said alliance would Batista's wins over Hunter have been as impressive?  Especially with everyone not sure with whom Flair would eventually side.  (which I still think may be the real reason behind this whole Triple H/Flair feud that we are in the midst of)
rey619Posted on 11/30/05 at 08:39:56

I meant that Triple H carried Batista in their matches.. not that they were spectacular or anything, but you got the idea that Batista had improved tremendously.. only to see what he was really about when JBL couldn't carry him the way Hunter did. Made me realize that no matter how much he is hated, Triple H really is a wonderful performer.

pszPosted on 11/30/05 at 16:37:36

I agree wholeheartedly.

The other thing he does well is put over young talent (As long as the title's not involved ;->)

How many times did HHH lose to Shelton Benjamin when SB came over from Smackdown? Great matches, clean wins, Benjamin went all the way to the IC title.

(Where's he now?)

Did the same with Batista... Hell, he did the same with Flair (Ok, so NOT-so-young talent, but gave you the Classic Flair feeling ;->)