FORUM HOME > Wrestling > US Independents
TNA in serious financial trouble

Critic of the DawnPosted on 11/27/04 at 23:47:00

It was the biggest week in TNA history, and now, from all signs, when it didn't pan out, the company is in critical condition.

Here is the basic financial score. Panda Energy, in the two plus years it has been funding TNA, has lost approximately $15million on the venture. This came on the heels of the $1.6 million Health South lost in getting the company off the ground. There may also have been losses that Jerry Jarrett incurred during the interim period between Health South money and Panda Energy money. Because of the cost of buying television time, producing television, and signing higher priced talent, the losses in recent months have hit $200,000 to $250,000 per week. With the exception of WCW from 1999 on, no wrestling company in history is believed to have ever burned money at anywhere near close to this rate. Worse, they've done so without really making any mark on the industry or having any significant public visibility. There is simply no possible way the company could make money as things stand, but that has been clear for some time. The weekly PPV system was a big loser. Overseas revenue, television ad revenue and merchandising income, something counted on for profitability because of the WWE model, has been largely non-existent. All the talk of doing house shows is a pipe dream, because WWE is having difficulty drawing for house shows, and TNA simply can't make money running house shows. IT would only cause more losses. The only revenue source is PPV.

While the company did what is being estimated by cable sources as 30,000 to 35,000 buys for Victory Road, which should bring the company from $385,000 to $450,000 in revenue, that only cuts monthly losses down to about $550,000 to $615,000 for November. Most likely, the number of buys drop for the Turning Point show in 12/5, although I don't expect them to drop drastically, and do consider the numbers, four times what they were averaging on Wednesdays, as a success. However, there were those internally pegging 50,000 buys as the prediction. The one good thing is it seems to be proven the monthly idea at $29.95 is far superior to the weekly at $9.95. The company, to break even, with all the costs, needs the PPV's, that are virtually all the revenue they have, to do nearly 80,000 buys per show to become financially solvent. With the cutting back of expenses by taping two shows of Impact every other week, a saving of between $100,000 and $200,000 a week, that cuts the needed buys to somewhere near 62,000 and 70,000 for the company to break-even, again figures which are unattainable. That number is simply impossible no matter what stars they get when the TV is on such a poor time slot. Smackdown, for instance, does close to five million viewers a week, and the last Smackdown PPV did less than 200,000 buys. TNA Impact does maybe 140,000 total viewers per week. The UFC, which is significantly hotter (although has virtually no television), doesn't come near the average TNA needs to break even on PPV shows, and only tops it when it has a really special main event. The numbers don't add up. As we've written so many times, the company's only answers if they were even in this game, was to know they needed patience, and until they got a good time slot for TV to have real visibility, and started bidding for top talent, they aren't even in the game. If they weren't willing to understand those rules, they had no business being in. Getting cold feet about losses now shows they never should have gotten in, because the venture had no potential for short-term profits until it established itself on TV in a good time slot and built an audience.

Far more important than the PPV numbers were the numbers for the two Best Damn Sports Show Period specials. The company was of the belief if they could average a 0.35 rating on the two 8pm showings on 11/10 and 11/11, that Fox Sports Net would turn Monday night into a wrestling night. They would have the BDSSP personalities do a weekly wrestling taping, for an 8-9.30 pm show in their regular time slot, which couldn't be better, getting the lead-in on Raw, and building to main events against the usual lengthy interview open. This wouldn't the old Monday Night Wars, because Fox Sports Net isn't even a blip on the radar screen compared to TNT, or even Spike. The credibility of the celebrities and the time slot would drive the wrestling product. The wrestling would drive the ratings of what is a poorly rated by heavily promoted network flagship show, and hopefully also serve to increase the rating a little for the rest of the week.

Unfortunately, the first set of ratings we got last week, which were based on the overnights, which still fell al little short, didn't hold up. The final numbers were: The original 8pm airing on 11/10 did a 0.26 rating (the show averages a 0.13 on Wednesday nights in the first run) and the 11pm airing did a 0.18 (averages 0.12). For 11/11, the first showing did a 0.18 (0.13 average in the slot), and 11pm showing did a 0.14 (0.12 average in that slot). At those numbers, the idea of getting a Monday prime time show is said to be highly unlikely by FSN sources. They were floating numbers claming they did triple what the show usually does, but they were really, for the two nights, 52% above, which is good, but not what they needed. UFC did an 0.43 a few years back, with a similar level of promotion, and worse, did a 0.47 with virtually no promotion on a Sunday afternoon. A James Toney boxing match on BDSSP did a 0.76 on the 8pm shows as the highest rated episode in the history of the show. The success of the Toney show is what got the BDSSP people interested in doing the pro wrestling week, as well as doing two boxing specials in December, including a Michael Moorer fight and the "Next Great Champ" championship match. The one thing that has to be noted when it comes to FSN ratings, is because we are talking about such low numbers, the margin of error is pretty high. The difference between a 0.1 and a 0.3 in some markets is just a viewer or two in the sample group. But it doesn't matter, because accurate or not, and the odds are those numbers could be just as inaccurate on the high side as the low side, they are the gospel of the industry. Several in the industry noted to us when they read the real numbers, it was an eerie feeling, knowing so much was riding on it, how much the margin of error really is, and knowing they came up well short of what they needed at such a critical time. Worse from a morale standpoint has to be the fact that the second night drew less than the first night, even though so much of the first night were angles to build to the matches on the second night. It's the same reality as the Friday ratings starting out so positively, and going down over time.

There are so many different things going on right now. The Jarrett's and the Carters don't see eye-to-eye, in particular Jeff Jarrett and Dixie Carter. It's been noted that Jerry Jarrett has clearly undermined Jeff, although it's a debatable point whether it's for the good of the company or not. Jerry has apparently felt Jeff's ideas about wrestling are too heavily influence by Vince Russo to the point Jerry can't steer him back to a logical wrestling direction. Russo is totally gone from the company, and had confided to friends he thought TNA was done as soon as Dixie Carter got pregnant, feeling once she had her baby, her focus would be less on her wrestling company that was such a money drain. Considering the booking position in a company like this is always in play, and as long as he's on the payroll he's always in a position to be called after a failure, his leaving a $100,000 per year job that he only worked one day per week speaks volumes of how he reads the future. Others say Jerry is totally living on past laurels, has really not kept up on the business closely in ten years and is totally out of step when it comes to modern wrestling and modern fans. From reading his book, you get the impression his lengthy experiences in wrestling have taught him a lot of valuable lessons regarding talent and booking, but he had also not kept up with the modern business, which is an historic kiss of death for even the giants of the industry when making a comeback after being away. A sale of the company by Panda, or even Panda folding the company, wouldn't surprise people close to the scene. Many expect one or the other to happen over the next 90 days. Jerry is now in more of a power position, while Dixie Carter had tried to appease wrestlers complaining that Jeff had booked the entire show around himself and were on the verge of leaving to giver her time and a change would be made. Jerry is thought to have the only chance to sign Hulk Hogan, since he gave Hogan one of his early breaks in the late 70's and Hogan at least respects him as a promoter and booker who does have a legitimate impressive track record, even though it was a different business and a full generation ago. One has to think Hogan is never coming, particularly now that the primetime slot is so unlikely, because since WCW, he's been very careful to avoid being tainted with failure. Jerry is also said to have the lead on two potential buyers, but Bob Carter has yet to give him a money figure that he wants for his stock. Unless the new ownership has a way to get them on a good time slot and expects losses while building the brand (and at that point you'd need a great booker with new ideas and the ability to get new talent over and have a unique concept of wrestling or else it'll fail even with a good slot), they would only be fooling themselves. The only fit I can see working is a deal with Turner Broadcasting, but even then, they won't be able to be put on the air likely until the spring of 2006.

Jerry's move was to replace Jeff as booker with Dusty Rhodes. To the surprise of many, Dutch Mantel still has a job and will be Rhodes' assistant, although nobody was taking bets on how long that would last. Jeremy Borash and Bill Banks are still giving input, but when the change was made on 11/19, it was clearly Dusty's direction from this point forward. Many noted that Jerry going with Dusty showed once again how out of touch Jerry is with modern wrestling. Rhodes, 69, is just a few years younger than Jarrett, and was a successful booker from 1984-86 with Jim Crockett Promotions during its national expansion, which first made the company bigger than it had ever been. The downside was by the end of 1987, when the company's business started falling due to going with a pat hand on top for too long (wrestling's repeated mistake of trying to relive glory periods after they are over), the company was deep in debt and would have declared bankruptcy by the end of 1988 had Turner Broadcasting not purchased the company because they wanted to keep the highly rated traditional wrestling programming.

Rhodes was a huge name in the industry during Jarrett's day as a major power broker as one of the top drawing wrestlers in the world for more than a decade. Rhodes also hasn't had a successful year booking since 1986, and has booked numerous companies, including WCW, and his own companies, with little to no success. When Rhodes has been asked about what he'd do to turn things around, he was of the opinion that the only thing that draws is bringing back old legends, and was down on a lot of the wrestlers being on top who weren't strong on interviews or had that special charisma. In the 80's, Rhodes' strength was an ability to make strong babyfaces, although none were ever over stronger than himself, which is certainly something the company needs. He's a big believer in talking over action in the ring, because he was a great talking in his day, and remained a headliner long after he could do little in the ring but have talented heels work off him. He has in the past had an ability to create stars, which this company needs, but few have shown a past history at that better than Jerry Jarrett. Doing so is virtually impossible when you have television that so few are watching.

The Rhodes system in the past has been based on having a company filled with great talkers, which, with a few notable exceptions, is exactly the weakness of the current crew. He inherits a lot of wrestlers who can deliver in the ring, most of whom come across as interchangeable and most of whom haven't gotten over to the weekly regulars. Rhodes built things around strong faces, who were never put in a position where they let the crowd down, chasing heel champions, who would escape with frequent screwjob endings. While his babyface philosophy is probably what is needed today, if he wasn't evolved from that thought process regarding big match finishes, this won't make it because that won't fly on PPV today. The other question that has to do with every booker who is a performer is, how much will he be allowed to feature himself, because he is just about the best talker in the company, but is almost three decades past his prime as a performer. And there is also the question if he'd be allowed to bring in his son, and if he'd avoid the natural over pushing of him and creating a new nepotism deal in a business choking with that problem. Rhodes was introduced as the new booker to the wrestlers at the taping on 11/23, although is direction won't start until the next taping, since the PPV was already booked. He talked to the X Division guys about slowing down their work, working on their promos and differentiating them.

It just shows how out of touch people are when a Gabe Sapolsky, who has a proven track record in 2004 in the US, doesn't get asked (not that he'd do it, but if you paid attention to the current wrestling scene he's clearly the best candidate out there). It's as if much of the industry has stalled around 1988, and nothing in the last 16 years has registered, because so many in power grew up and learned wrestling in the 70's and 80's. At least Mantel had a successful track record coming in. The negative was Puerto Rico is a completely different culture with fan base described as closer to 70's level US than modern level, and a culture filled with established starts with mainstream name recognition. Most importantly, in Puerto Rico, both groups had TV that everybody watches. Mantel's jump from WWC to IWA as booker coincided with the turning around of that wrestling war, and he was a significant part of it, even though he's not well liked there these days. But he wasn't able to do much of anything for this product. Some of his stuff has been logical by the book. Nothing has been particularly grabbing. But, ultimately, it was doomed without TV, and still doomed with TV on such a weak network in such a poor timeslot.

As noted last week, the official decision was made this week of going to bi-weekly tapings of Impact to cut costs, and numerous other cost cutting measures are expected. The company taped two shows on 11/23, and will tape again on 12/7 and 12/21. Xplosion will turn into a magazine format show. It is expected that wrestlers will be paid per show they appear on, so the guys who work every TV show won't be cut in pay, and will actually have an easier schedule only having to travel every other week. The positives of this are cutting in half of television production costs. There is a negative in the lack of immediacy, particularly for the second week show, which would be on a 12-day tape delay. In the slow moving wrestling business of a decade ago, that would be no problem, but in today's business, where things break on almost a daily basis, and with such a specialized small audience, that could be significant. Still, given the finances, it's the right option for now, and it can be changed if needed. If the company will pay wrestlers per show they appear on and their incomes aren't sliced in half, it's largely a benefit. If wrestlers suddenly get their income slashed at this point, after being cut once when Wednesday PPV's were dropped, it would kill morale. At the same time, it isn't like there are a lot of options available these days.
Source: Dave Meltzer's Wrestling Observer

According to the above, TNA is expected by many to fold within 90 days.  Here's hoping they can turn things around, but from the sound of it they're in way too deep at this point, losing money as fast as WCW did in 1999.  Do you think they can turn things around with all the problems they're facing?  How?  If they *do* fold, who will emerge as competition to WWE's millions, and when?  Which talent would you like to see acquired by WWE?  Who would do better on the indie circuit?  And do you have any other thoughts on the whole situation?

Personally, I'm pessimistic about TNA's future.  I'm not really a fan (being an ROH fan and a TNA fan at the same time is very hard), but I do appreciate that they're trying to make the business competitive again, which is good for wrestlers across the country.  Short of Turner signing on as a backer for the company, I believe it's far too late for any changes to save the already sinking ship that is TNA... and it's a shame.  From the sound of it, they've taken the book from Jarrett and have really been trying to put on an all around better product.  Unfortunately, it would seem to be too little too late.

As for who will compete with WWE... that's a mystery.  Nobody can realistically do so without a good timeslot on a major network, and the chances of that happening are slim unless someone highly placed in the television industry takes a personal interest and pulls some major strings.  Considering WWE's continually falling ratings, it might be interesting to see whether a real competitor emerges before WWE starts losing some of its B-Shows.  At the moment, I doubt it.  I can tell you in all honesty that I don't expect Ring of Honor to turn into major national competition.  The people running the company are being extremely cautious financially with it, and after having a local TV show proved to be a huge money pit, they don't appear to be interested in having one, to say nothing of Pay Per Views, etc.  At the rate they're going (emphasizing slow, cautious expansion), it'll take a decade for them to be promoting shows nationwide, but I can see them sticking around for quite some time.

If TNA DOES fold, WWE will almost certainly grab Abyss (a hell of a big man by all accounts), Monty Brown (a future star with great charisma), and America's Most Wanted (possibly North America's best Tag Team at the moment).  Maybe Trinity as well, if WWE decides to push Women's wrestling again.  Aside from them, however, I don't think many of them would make it very far in WWE.  WWE likes their wrestlers big, and most of TNA's (and the indies' in general) best talent is under 6'0" and 225 pounds, and WWE's continued disregard for their Cruiserweight Division tells me that most of them would be better served by trying to make waves in Japan.

Thoughts?

Eric "Critic of the Dawn"
Rick GarrardPosted on 11/28/04 at 00:40:58

The big thing is when they fold will Vince McMahon offer the new WWE training program in Atlanta to Dutch Mantell?

Dutch was one of the guys responsible for the USWA when WWE was using it as a developmental territory.  And Dutch had a pretty decent relationship with WWE while being head booker for IWA-Puerto Rico.  Given that Dutch seems to "get the business" better than just about any other booker not in the WWE right now, I'd venture that he'd be the obvious choice.  

Personally I think the ONLY way there will be any competition with WWE is another underground start-up similar to that of WWE.  The problem is that almost NO ONE supports their local indy feds any more.  And by not supporting the local indy, you are basically acknowledging that NO ONE should compete with WWE, which is a very unfortunate statement.

I, for one, was VERY pleased to learn of a "new" local indy back in Indiana when I was home last week.  Dick the Bruiser Jr (formerly the wrestler known as Tim the Golden Lion and in reality Bruiser's ex-son-in-law) runs the new indy.  He is the headliner with Bobo Brazil Jr (formerly the wrestler known as Calypso Jim).   And best of all... they have brought back evil heel of the old WWA-Indianapolis, in Dr. Jerry Graham Jr., who is the leader of his own "faction" called the WWO, a very nWo like faction.  Graham is still a heat magnet like he always was in the 80's.  And it was Bruiser's WWA where Scott Rechsteiner got his start while still in college.  So to see a return of an indy fed to a majority of Indiana is very appreciated, as they even have a weekly 1/2 hour TV show that is VERY well produced for a LOCAL program.

It's really a shame that more smaller indy feds don't go this route... buying a late night 1/2 time slot on a local TV station with rights to their own commericial revenues during the programs.  Cause I'd have to think that while they wouldn't make much money, they'd at least have to break even... and breaking even, is better than losing money like Jarrett & Co. have done for the last two years.  

It was the move from the Nashville Fairgrounds that killed TNA.  Hopefully, they do show the WWE footage on TV in the next couple weeks... just so WWE can squash Jeff Jarrett for the fool that he is one more time.  I think Jerry Jarrett, while supposedly out of touch with "modern wrestling and modern fans" is actually smarter than given credit for.  I think a proper re-education of the fans is what is needed.  And to do that, one must give them an all around good card.  Like the early days of ECW and NOT the drivel they put out once they got PPV.

By well rounded I mean a match with a couple up and comers, a comedy match,  a good solid tag team wrestling match, a brutally stiff hardcore/weapons filled brawl, an actual wrestling match with some good ground based mat action, a flippy-floppy highflyer match (or lucha match) (this could also be of the tag variety), and of course at least two heavyweight matches, with one being your heavyweight title match (or whichever match you are featuring).   Too many times nowadays, a card will have the same type of match for EVERY match on the card.  And this eventually burns out your fans.  You have to get them to ride the roller coaster of emotion during the event buidling to the main event, which is something that is truly lacking in most wrestling cards for at least the last 5 years.

Granted I was not a proponent of the WCW's on the fly booking, but looking back at the old Nitro episodes recently, they did use this well-rounded formula a LOT during the weeks they were killing WWE in the ratings war.  Their biggest downfall was when WCW became a parody of itself.
91Posted on 11/28/04 at 19:41:58

They may well pick up guys like A.J. based on name value garnered and, certainly in Styles case, undeniable talent, though whether they'd be used effectively is anybodies guess (I'd see him being pushed at the same level as Rey with the other small guys somewhere behind that, save for anyone who gets a random character that catches on). Otherwise, Americas Most Wanted is probably the best bet for a WWE move since they've already shown interest in the pair. It doesn't help that several TNA guys (Jarrett, Douglas, Kash etc) have done some nice bridge burning in one way or another.
Snabbit888Posted on 11/28/04 at 22:23:57

Plus, they offered Styles a developmental contract a few years back, but AJ could make more money a week doing indy shows so he declined, so they've shown interest in him as well.
91Posted on 11/28/04 at 22:54:43

Yeah, didn't he do some dark matches?
Snabbit888Posted on 11/28/04 at 23:14:59

I think so.

I know that the guys from Team Canada (not sure about Petey Williams, but the rest at least) have done a lot of dark matches too.  That probably doesn't mean anything, but yeah.
Critic of the DawnPosted on 11/28/04 at 23:16:53

I'd like to think that they'd utilize a cruiser with the reputation and skill of AJ Styles well, but I have a hard time believing they would.  Look at how poorly they've used Ultimo Dragon, Spanky and Paul London, as an example.  All three are roughly on par with Styles in ring ability, and Spanky at least is much more charismatic.  Yet Ultimo Dragon was banished to HeAT after a huge buildup to his debut, Spanky came across as a huge future star against Cena and Angle for a month before dissappearing to Velocity and eventually quitting, and London got a brief run with the tag team titles before - you guessed it - having his feud with Kidman apparently dropped and returning to Velocity.  I see no reason to expect Styles to be treated differently by WWE.

Eric "Critic of the Dawn"
Snabbit888Posted on 11/28/04 at 23:37:32

You fool!  Ultimo Dragon was banished to Velocity, not Heat.  Your credibility = shot
Critic of the DawnPosted on 11/29/04 at 08:36:17

I had credibility?

Eric "Critic of the Dawn"
Snabbit888Posted on 11/29/04 at 15:58:41

It's a moot point now, Mr. No Cred!
PulsarPosted on 11/29/04 at 17:27:36

*Watches Heat, and waits for Ultimo Dragon.....then cries*
rey619Posted on 11/30/04 at 00:27:12

Actually, London was injured.. so I don't think he is being de-pushed again. It's just that with all that nonsense on SD nowadays (Tough Enough, Thanksgiving shit), it just ain't room to build up feuds. All they can do is try to build up a 3-4 feuds per show, and it is usually the main event category (Eddie, Kurt, Big SHow, Taker, JBL, Booker), and then we have the "these-guys-draw-fans-but-we'll-never-appreciate-them" kinda people like RVD and Rey Mysterio who is put in various feuds just to let them do something. The Chavo and Billy feud is great, in my opinion, but last week (or maybe the week before that), they had a match that was cut from TV because they instead wanted to show reruns of what the tough enough idiots had done half an hour earlier.

Yeah, this is off topic, just wanted to say that I don't think London is being buried just yet.  
Rick GarrardPosted on 11/30/04 at 00:53:48

Ultimo's Shockmaster like entrance at WrestleMania was the most unfortunate thing in his WWE career.  He was sliding all over the place on that plastic stage coating they had.  And then he fell off the ropes in the ring doing a pose.  He was obviously VERY nervous to be at WM20 and at MSG.  Tis a shame, that when he comes back to WWE he will now be known as Asai (or Yoshihiro Asai), his real name and without the mask.
AllPowerfulGARTHPosted on 11/30/04 at 06:34:08

HAAAAHAHAHAHA that entrance was the greatest thing ever.  Ultimo lost to the entrance ramp before he even entered the Cruiserweight Open match.  Isn't the ramp over the weight limit?
Rick GarrardPosted on 11/30/04 at 07:29:12

it was so great that they have apparently cut it out of the DVD version of WM20.  :)

Thankfully I have a tape of it from the PPV.  Which is worth it just for the Brock vs Goldberg with Austin as ref match where all three are just going through the motions knowing that they are all leaving soon.
91Posted on 11/30/04 at 19:49:48

On 11/30/04 at 07:29:12, Rick Garrard wrote:it was so great that they have apparently cut it out of the DVD version of WM20. :)

Thankfully I have a tape of it from the PPV. Which is worth it just for the Brock vs Goldberg with Austin as ref match where all three are just going through the motions knowing that they are all leaving soon.
Hmmm, my DVD doesn't have anything cut out of the Goldberg/Lesnar match, not even the chanting or Lawlers sarcastic commentary. Sadly Ultimo WAS cut, but the important thing is the above match was untouched, that was comedy gold.
Rick GarrardPosted on 12/01/04 at 01:22:24

Hmmm, my DVD doesn't have anything cut out of the Goldberg/Lesnar match, not even the chanting or Lawlers sarcastic commentary. Sadly Ultimo WAS cut, but the important thing is the above match was untouched, that was comedy gold.
Yes I realize that nothing was cut from the craptastic match that was Goldberg vs Lesnar.  I didn't say that it was cut from the DVD.  I only said that the Ultimo slippage was.  And that the reason to actually watch the WM.. was the whole craptastic match showing what can happen when fans turn on the entire thing for as you said the comedy of it all.
Critic of the DawnPosted on 04/13/05 at 15:25:05

And... here's the latest resport on the death of TNA, which amusingly seems to have been imminent for the past year or so.  Frankly, if they've been losing as much money as I hear, I'm surprised they've been able to hold on this long.

Meltzer reports more doom and gloom for TNA. They have no more ppv's planned at this point after June and also their year long contract with Universal Studio ends that month as well!....Monty Brown only has a few month left with his contract and will no doubt be headed to WWE...Dusty Rhodes continues to have major heat on him and Kevin Nash was outspoken against him in a recent Torch interview...Meltzer's opinion is Dusty is desperate, so he decided to make it all cage matches on the Lockdown ppv which is something "territories on last legs do."...The main event of that show is what they really are billing as a "lethal lottery" but actually instead of it being like the old WCW Battle Bowl, it will be like War Games where two will enter then they will do a coin toss where one team gets the advantage and it doesn't end until all 6 are in and weapons can also be used...The sense is, The Carter Family seems to be giving up more on the "project" as time goes by and recently some workers were shorted on pay while others were told to wait for pay day...Dusty was told by Dixie Carter and Jerry Jarrett to lose the pick up truck as his office on TV and to stop having Traci and Trinity as farmer's daughters type character and change them to a modern look.
Source: The Observer

Not good news for TNA.  To me, it feels like the future of the company is hanging in the balance.  If Spike TV decides to take a risk and put TNA on in RAW's old timeslot, TNA might have a chance of taking off due to the ongoing releases of solid talent by WWE and the Diva Search causing WWE Fans to channel surf.  If the timing works out that way, which I'm not sure it will.  If it doesn't... Panda Energy may finally pull the plug after a solid go at creating an alternative wrestling product.  If TNA does go under... well, the industry will be in a very poor position, and it seems likely that wages for wrestlers will continue to decline due to the lack of competition at the top.

Eric "Critic of the Dawn"
Rick GarrardPosted on 04/14/05 at 02:18:58

After this past Sunday's LIVE UFC show on Spike TV, I would have to say it looks like they may be the odds on favorite to replace RAW on the Monday night lineup with a two hour show each Monday.  Former SportsChannel Chicago studio host Mike Goldberg and Fear Factor's Joe Rogan were the two announcers for the program and did a rather good job introducing everyone that may not be hardcore UFC fans to the product with their first ever live cable TV special.  They showed the replay of this show immediately after RAW this past Monday as well which was mainly the blowoff show for The Ultimate Fighter reality show and a pre-PPV builder for this coming Sunday's showdown between Randy Couture and Chuck Liddell.  The best part of the whole show was watching Ken Shamrock get grounded and pounded in the main event.

Speaking of losing money with programming, I'm pretty sure that SEG Inc., the former owners of the UFC in it's pre-sanctioned days, were losing money as badly as the claims on TNA are.  The current owner of UFC seemingly has deep pockets and a good business sense when it comes to the UFC, which is going to help in making UFC the next big thing on cable TV.
AllPowerfulGARTHPosted on 04/14/05 at 23:55:12

Hahaha that main event was great.  Shamrock falls over!  ORTON WINS!